PLPramaana

Strategic Games Arena

Updated 5/30/2026
Pramaana Original

Evaluates planning, adaptation, and opponent modeling in text-based imperfect-information games.

Model leaderboard

Run settings: temperature 0, max tokens 16384, extended reasoning, 3 repeated runs.68.00% ± 1.16$4.39471s
Run settings: temperature 0.2, max tokens 16384, extended reasoning, 3 repeated runs.65.88% ± 0.48$0.26264s
Run settings: temperature 0, max tokens 16384, extended reasoning, 4 repeated runs.63.92% ± 1.33$5.30509s
Run settings: temperature 0, max tokens 16384, extended reasoning, 5 repeated runs.62.11% ± 1.50$3.18905s
Run settings: temperature 0, max tokens 16384, extended reasoning, 6 repeated runs.60.82% ± 1.67$2.80425s
Run settings: temperature 0, max tokens 16384, standard reasoning, 4 repeated runs.59.01% ± 0.65$3.99464s
Run settings: temperature 0, max tokens 16384, standard reasoning, 3 repeated runs.57.24% ± 1.16$0.61164s
8GLM 5.2OPEN
Run settings: temperature 0.2, max tokens 16384, standard reasoning, 6 repeated runs.
57.00% ± 0.99$0.56348s
Run settings: temperature 0, max tokens 16384, standard reasoning, 5 repeated runs.56.82% ± 0.82$1.64264s
Run settings: temperature 0.2, max tokens 16384, standard reasoning, 4 repeated runs.56.80% ± 1.33$0.48285s

Results reflect a fixed evaluation snapshot. API prices and provider behavior may change after the recorded run date.

License: Research preview

Motivation

Generic leaderboards rarely show whether a model can complete the work people actually depend on. This evaluation turns a real workflow into a controlled, repeatable test with visible uncertainty, cost, and latency.

Results

Industry average accuracy comparison

Mean score with standard-error whiskers across repeated runs.

Claude Fable 568.00% ± 1.16
Muse Spark 1.165.88% ± 0.48
GPT-5.6 Sol63.92% ± 1.33

Key takeaways

  • Models plan well but adapt slowly to adversarial opponents.
  • Compact state summaries improve long-horizon consistency.
  • Negotiation performance varies sharply by prompting profile.

Methodology

Every system is run against the same frozen task set and scorer. Results are the mean across repeated trials; uncertainty is reported as the standard error of the mean. Costs use public API pricing at evaluation time and latency is measured end to end.

Evaluation items
600
Repeated runs
3–6 / system

Updates

  1. 5/30/2026

    Latest frontier model results added.

  2. 5/12/2026

    Scorer calibration and refusal handling updated.

  3. 2/18/2026

    Evaluation set published.